Skip to main content
Timeline of the rape case and trial, based on court records.

I noticed that bail was at $1.6 million.
.
.
.
June 2012: First incidents reported (two girls), case was accidentally dropped by Hamilton County, resumed in December 2018.*


April 2017: Second incidents (two boys), reported in March and November 2018


2/7/19 Precipe for Warrant Filed and Warrant issued. Indictment.
2/8/19 Arrested
2/11 Charged. Judge Assigned Case. Entry Appointing Counsel
2/13 Hamilton County Sheriff: I Have In Custody And Have Served Copy Of Indictment On Said Defendant By Deputy Sheriff
2/13 Defendant's Demand For Discovery. Request For Bill Of Particulars. Request For Notice Of Intention To Use Evidence 


2/14 Plea Of Not Guilty Entered At Arraignment. Bond $1.6 Million.
2/26 State's Response To Defendant's Demand For Discovery.
3/25 Motion For Discovery
3/29 Report Of Examiner Pursuant To Law. Report Located In Clerk Of Courts Office Rm 315. Competency 


4/3 Prosecutor Subpoena For Witness Issued To April Barker-Casey. Entry Compelling Defendant To Submit To Medical Examination For Venereal Diseases Pursuant To Section 2907.27,R.C Entry Finding Defendant Competent For Purpose Of Standing Trial 


4/4 Subpoenas
4/13 Entry Approving Counsel Fees $3650.00
4/16 Subpoenas
4/24 Motion For Separate Trials
5/10 Motion To Take Testimony Of Child Outside Of Courtroom
5/17 Entry Finding Defendant Has Waived His Right To Counsel
5/20 Jury Impaneled And Sworn 


The trial was conducted on a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Friday. The defense rested on Friday. Concluding arguments and judge's charge to the jury -- scheduled for Tuesday.

* The rapes and GSI were first reported in 2012. However, the Hamilton County sheriff's office accidentally dropped their investigation when a detective retired. A detective told the story on Wednesday about how he heard about the case from the Cincinnati detective, went to the basement archives for 2012 and couldn't find the case file. But then noticed a box with the name of the retired detective, in which he found a few items for the case.

This isn't everything in the record, but I think all the major items.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Race, violence, and justice. How has race mattered in the rape trial I've been observing? 1. Yesterday, the defendant called his one and only witness. She's a former girlfriend, the mother of one of the alleged victims. They had a long Q&A or conversation, maybe 45 minutes. The judge interrupted them, periodically, supposedly for the sake of the court reporter (never the jury IIRC) sitting 3 feet from the witness, to tell them to speak more slowly or more loudly, not to speak over each other. But the problem wasn't their speed or volume, it was their 𝘈𝘧𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩 (see article below). 2. The defendant and the 4 victims are African American. But nearly everybody judging the case is (or passes as) white. The whites include the judge, the prosecution team (except 1), 10/12 jurors, the backup public defender, the victim advocates, the social workers (well, I missed 1 or 2), the clerk, the bailiff, and all the police o...
Emotions and testimony If there's a "typical" rape trial, are victims steered to testify about the pain and feelings that they experienced? Or do prosecutors tend to downplay the emotional aspects? I'm observing a trial in Cincinnati. The victims were minors, ages 7-10 at the time, 2 girls and 2 boys. In their testimony, they said little about their emotions -- and the prosecutor didn't asked them about it IIRC. Perhaps with an adult victim of rape, the prosecutor has to show a lack of consent and thus might focus more on emotional and physical pain? Whereas when the victims are children, would the prosecution downplay emotions because they assume that jurors would imagine the worse, or would already see rape of children as intrinsically monstrous enough? Or because they want to (appear to) protect the survivors' from undue trauma? Or because a child's capability to testify is fragile, so they keep to the basic observable facts? We...